Many banks failed to recognise the reputational risk associated with their off-balance sheet vehicles. In stressed conditions some firms went beyond their contractual obligations to support their sponsored securitisations and off- balance sheet vehicles.
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, January 2009
ADVISORY SERVICES
Of all the risk classes, reputation risk causes both the most confusion and the least action. And yet, serious players have attributed the financial crisis, at least proximately, to reputation risk. What is going on (or not going on, as the case may be)?
The problem is that reputation risk is a secondary risk – it arises as a result of some other risk event – and amplifies the exposure of the firm to the primary event. The risk is transmitted to the reputation of the firm through the impact of the primary event on an audience (mostly, but not always, external) which then reflects the risk back on to the image and ultimately cashflows of the firm, usually via media exposure. In exceptional cases, the intermediate transmission mechanism is government response through direct sanction or increasing regulatory strictures.
In the case of government agencies, the impact is more diffuse; the image of the agency is tarnished, its credibility and authority diminished and ‘heads roll’.
Because it is a secondary risk, reputation risk cannot be managed directly as can other risks; the management approach must be more thematic. First, reputation is a major asset of the firm (albeit an intangible one), but very few firms have any measure of the actual value of the asset. That needs to change. Only through valuing the asset explicitly will the firm have any idea of the resources to commit to maintenance of the value of the asset when it is under threat. That requires a systematic approach to understanding the boundaries of the firm (the banking problem). Secondly, the firm needs an active programme of understanding and managing its reputation that is linked to the value-building strategies of the firm. That programme should – must – align to the firm’s communication strategies in each market and to each stakeholder group. Thirdly, the firm needs to have a practised approach to managing crises; it need to be trialled and kept current.
We assist firms in each aspect of the reputation risk challenge so that they will never be caught unprepared. As Pasteur observed, “chance favours only the prepared mind”.
> RISK DISCLOSURE
You are viewing the text version of this site.
To view the full version please install the Adobe Flash Player and ensure your web browser has JavaScript enabled.
Need help? check the requirements page.